Free Trees

I helped give away free Christmas trees last night. There’s some happy people in DG because of this.

Cool for many reasons, among them: there are still Knights of the Templar walking among us (!), and there has to be more people this year who look at $50+ for a tree and wonder how to prioritize that into a shrunken Christmas budget.

The Village is trying out for the part of Scrooge again this year. They never stopped it when the trees were at the Mason Lodge a couple doors east, but this year the DGTRO agreed to help, and it moved to the wall next to the Curtiss Street HQ. Much better location.

So just coincidence this year here comes Code Enforcement to scuff their shoes around the periphery, trying to come up with a reason to stop this display of holiday good will.

The best they could come up with is move them back a foot or two, they can’t encroach on public property, the empty grass lawn on the corner.

The trees are there tonight and Friday night. If you know someone who might be in need, tell, them, stop by, bring them by. Merry Christmas one and all!

You Can Fool Some of the People Some of the Time…

http://wakingamericaup.wordpress.com/2011/12/17/reporters-challenge-to-candidates-petition-challenge/#comment-353

..but it’s starting to look like you can’t run doodly past Waking America Up. Defiantly and unapologetic-ally conservative, this recent post outs one Lucy Lloyd, shill and cut-out for Megan Schroeder and her Advocates pals.

After reading Lloyd’s calumn I have to wonder why Wurster and Krajewski even bothered answering the phone when she called.

Cross check the Voter History for Mr. Peters III- he’s never pulled a primary ballot here, and voted once in 2010. The DGTRO has open precincts that need PC’s. If any of them bothered ever coming to a meeting they’d have found that out.

Waking America Up left out that Ms. Lloyd was also Campaign Manager for Megan Schroeder’s infamous Advocates 2007 election, and has been a reliable shill for Advocates causes and candidates ever since.

They also left out that Julia Kennedy-Beckman is the Democratic Party State Central Committee Representative for the 13th District. She’s a fixture at every Advocates function, in addition to being a founding member. They don’t have her name listed anymore. Rewriting history maybe.

PS- Because some jackass will bring this up later like it’s a deep dark secret, I vetted Deb’s packet, I even went through it and had Deb delete invalid signatures. I filed her packet that Monday morning at 8:00am, and met some folks, like Ms. Boyle, who were looking to bring change, to stop how our state is run into the dirt. No Sandack people were anywhere to be seen. Who filed for him?

I pulled Ron’s packet and vetted it. It was a mess, but as near as I could tell he actually had 500 valid signatures. Ron had a research professional from a top downtown law firm pull Boyle’s. Ron’s been planning this run since this summer, lining up big wheel support. Boyle waited to see if Patti Bellock would run in 81.

Maybe voters should look at both packets to help decide who takes this more seriously.

UPDATE- I was emailed that Ms. Lloyd no longer lives in Downers Grove, nor in House District 81, nor in Illinois.

Three Strikes Is Too Many; SEVEN TIMES Is Too Much

The following is directly copied from a paid advertisement.

Three different times, the Illinois legislature has rejected a proposal put forward by out-of-state energy company Tenaska to build the Taylorville Energy Center. This “clean coal” plant would leave Illinois families, businesses and government agencies paying up to SEVEN TIMES today’s market price for electricity. When the legislature meets November 29, Tenaska will try once again to get Illinois consumers to foot the bill for their coal plant, which Illinois doesn’t need.

Please take a moment now to contact your legislator and let them know you oppose the Taylorville Energy Center. Here are the facts:

• The Taylorville Energy Center would cost Illinois electricity consumers $286 million per year.

• Illinois businesses and industry would bear the risks and absorb most cost overruns, making it harder to create jobs.

• Tenaska wants Illinois consumers to pay even if the Taylorville Energy Center never produces more than a single megawatt of power.

• The plant would add only two-tenths of one percent to the overall amount of power generation capacity available to Illinois

Your voice matters in stopping this legislation. Thanks for letting your legislator know that you oppose the Taylorville Energy Center. Visit www.STOPCoalition.com to learn more.

Just Give It To Us Straight

We’re big boys and girls, we can handle it.

Last night a County Board member, from District 3, asserted in front of the DGTRO folks in attendance that DuPage County had reduced it’s spending by $45 million dollars. This struck me as an odd statement, so I looked it up.

In 2005 the Total Appropriation for DuPage County was $608,910,218. In 2010 the Total Appropriation was $689,093,552. That’s a net increase $80,183,334, a 16.4% increase that out-stripped the chained CPI for the same six year period of 12.5% (BLS’s table HERE). You can access Consolidated Annual Financial Reports HERE to verify it for yourself. CAFR’s are useful things; uniform reports filed at the State that allow for apples to apples comparos of results. Budgets are intentions, CAFR’s are results. CAFR’s make it hard to hide promises and boasts that aren’t true.

Credit where credit is due: the efforts to hold the line on taxes at the County level have worked better than any other level of govt. They’ve plenty of good things they can accurately report on.

Accuracy. One of the continuing items that nags at supporters of either political party is a basic lack of accuracy by our elected officials. It feeds suspicion that either a) they are not in command of basic facts, b) they don’t understand the difference between things like cuts, savings, and spending reductions, or c) they’re liars. I doubt that County Board member is a liar.

It’s not just DGTRO members at a monthly meeting that deserve the unvarnished truth when we’re getting supposedly reliable information from our elected officials, all residents deserve it all the time. Accurate information is paramount. Continuing the norm of blowing smoke up our figurative skirts doesn’t accomplish that.

SB1652

Selling out cheap. 

SB1652 supposedly guarantees Illinois power delivery moves into the 21st Century, just like California and most of the Northeast. Nevermind the states that have moved forward on Smart Grid type technologies now have the highest electricity rates. Never mind the obvious logic that if it would make power delivery more efficient and cost effective, power companies looking to lower cost and increase returns would find the financing to impliment it. Nevermind most states that have stood pat, like Kentucky, Indiana, Iowa, and Missouri, have industrial rates 24-25% lower than Illinois, making them even more competetive for manufacturing and the jobs that follow. Never mind that ComEd, serving over 3.7 million customers at 10.9 cents/KwH, rakes in over $4.5 billion in annual revenue. By the way, size doesn’t matter: Naperville Electrical Department (NED) serves 56 thousand accounts, at 8.82 cents/KwH, almost 20% cheaper than ComEd.*

Is private risk for private profit a foreign concept in Illinois? Baseball teams get lavish deals on taxpayers tabs. The Chicago Park District gets a football stadium built with state tax dollars. Power companies have taxpayers pay ahead on rquired upgrades to their systems instead of taking on the risk and debt themselves. Our leaders socialize the costs out of our wallets, yet still privatize the profits back to the companies we pick up the tab for.

Why stop there, though? The Illinois GA this week also guarantees a profit every step of the way for these private companies. No risk, yet guaranteed private profit. Wouldn’t we all like that kind of investment? I bet the teachers would right about now. That such a skewed result of legislation gets the limelight, while no budget fixes, or pension fixes that actually address the problem remain completely unaddressed, doesn’t matter. What matters in Illinois? That both sides of the General Assembly aisle got to slop at the trough of lobby money. For less than a penny on the dollar, Ameren, Exelon, and ComEd have locked in billions of future profits, by simply buying the votes of most of the Illinois General Assembly.

The Illinois Campaign for Political Reform collates and creates a sortable database of who buys what in Illinois. so far just in 2011 the three power companies have walked the halls of Springfield and handed out the goodies, the grease that keeps incumbent campaigns running, that keeps caucuses loyal, and that keeps business as usual churning away.

Results for 2011

Ameren gave $ 103,408.00
Ameren CILCO gave 
$ 1,000.00
AMEREN ILLINOIS PAC gave 
$ 2,500.00
Ameren CILCO gave 
$ 19,700.00
Ameren CILCO c/o Michael Sullivan gave 
$ 2,000.00
Ameren CIPS PAC gave 
$ 3,000.00
Ameren Government Relations Dept gave 
$ 1,000.00
Ameren IL PAC gave 
$ 8,250.00
Ameren IL. PAC gave 
$ 1,000.00
Ameren Illinois gave 
$ 94,651.00
Ameren Illinois PAC gave 
$ 151,399.00
Ameren Illinois Utilities gave 
$ 1,000.00
Ameren PAC gave 
$ 1,500.00
Ameren, IL gave 
$ 1,000.00
AmerenCilco gave 
$ 500.00
AmerenIllinois gave 
$ 3,500.00
AmerenIllinois PAC gave 
$ 1,000.00
Amerenn CILCO gave 
$ 2,500.00

Sub total all Ameren: $398,908

Results for 2011
ComEd gave 
$ 10,117.00
ComEd PAC gave 
$ 77,550.00
ComEd PAC Attn. Cheryl L. Hyman gave 
$ 8,000.00
ComEd PAC. gave 
$ 250.00
ComEdPAC gave 
$ 47,200.00

Sub total all ComEd: $143,117 

Results for 2011
Commonwealth Edison Co- Affiliate of Exelon Corp, PAC gave 
$ 500.00
Exelon gave 
$ 9,250.00
Exelon Gen Pac gave 
$ 500.00
Exelon Generation gave 
$ 1,000.00
Exelon Generation Co gave 
$ 500.00
Exelon Generation Company gave 
$ 9,750.00
Exelon Generation Company LLC gave 
$ 5,000.00
Exelon Generation Company PAC gave 
$ 8,500.00
Exelon Generation Company, LLC gave 
$ 4,750.00
Exelon Generation Copmpany gave 
$ 250.00
Exelon Generation PAC gave 
$ 4,000.00
Exelon Generaton Company PAC gave 
$ 1,000.00
Exelon PAC gave 
$ 8,750.00
Exelon-Commonwealth Edison Company gave 
$ 2,000.00
Exelonpac gave 
$ 1,000.00

Sub total all Exelon: $56,750

Total all contributions for 2011 only: $598,775

House votes are here, Senate votes are here.

US Senator Kirk’s Debt Report

“While Illinois is an American state with substantially stronger institutions than Europe, its debt load per person is higher than for citizens in Spain, Portugal, Ireland or Greece.”
Click on the cover page to read the report.

The First Lady, Someone Who Has Eaten Countless Meals, Weighs In

from Michelle Obama info@barackobama.com
reply-to info@barackobama.com
to Mark Thoman <markthoman@gmail.com>
date Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM
subject These dinners
mailed-by bounce.bluestatedigital.com
signed-by barackobama.com

Mark –

Not everyone knows how to prepare for a dinner like this. As someone who’s eaten countless meals with my husband, I want to tell you the one thing to do if you’re selected to join him…

Just relax. Barack wants this dinner to be fun, and he really loves getting to know supporters like you.

I hope you’ll take him up on it before Friday’s deadline.

 

Read the rest of this entry »

BGA and Illinois Review Get Play’d

How did Tip put it? All politics are local?

www.dgreport.com has over 150 posts first-hand witnessing the arrogance and abuse of power of the CHSD 99 Board of Education and the majority members of that board over the years. It all happened specifically after long time Board member and President Bruce Beckman stepped down after 20 years of service, and before current Board President Bill White was elected to the middle chair.

During that in-between time the former Superintendent got stiff final year pay raises (from $187.2K in 2005 to $256.5K+ in 2008) to goose his pension; the local teachers union made campaign contributions to the majority board members election fund; FOIA’s were routinely denied; no one knows how many times the OMA was violated; reporters verbally harassed when they wrote articles the board majority disliked; a board member silenced for trying to talk about cheaper insurance options; residents denied the chance to speak at meetings; few accurate recordings or minutes kept of public meetings; Township Democratic Party newsletters stacked in the School Districts Administration building during School Board meetings, and more. The Board President during all of this was/is Julia Kennedy-Beckman, the Democratic State Central Committee 13th District Representative. Read the rest of this entry »

An Unusual Come-On

Mark, can we meet for dinner?

More
from Barack Obama info@barackobama.com
reply-to info@barackobama.com
to Mark Thoman <markthoman@gmail.com>
date Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:51 PM
subject Mark, can we meet for dinner?
mailed-by bounce.bluestatedigital.com
signed-by barackobama.com

Mark –

Supporters like you are the reason I’m here, and the values we share have always made our organization more than just a political campaign.

So whenever I can, I want to take the opportunity to meet you. Last month, that meant I got to talk to folks in Iowa about small-business opportunities, and sit down with a group of volunteers from around the country who helped build this campaign in their communities this summer.

Today, I want to ask if you’ll join me and three other supporters for a meal and conversation sometime soon. Read the rest of this entry »

McCartney 8/1/2011 Wrigley Field

Went to hear McCartney last night. For 69 years old the guy had an incredible back up band that carried the old Beatles multi-part harmonies really well, and they shredded the rockers.

Monday set (unless otherwise noted, REALLY tight and true): Read the rest of this entry »

Waking Up America

I haven’t been blogging for quite a while. I don’t know if I’ll ever get back into it with the fervor I had. When I went over to Elaine Johnson’s DGreport it attracted attention from all kinds. Elaine has since gone on to a real full time job at the helm of Downers Grove Patch and is doing a great job. Patch is pretty mainstream, and has sevral writers worth reading. Wendy Foster, Tony Cesare are but two of the many I happily follow.

This site, Waking Up America, is by a fellow DG’er, and it’s mainly political commentary, consistently conservative when it shows. Apparently part of the DuPage County Tea Party (gasp, they must be awful people!). He’s been at it since 2009, making him a veteran local voice. He’s not a tool, and doesn’t appear to be a shill for anyone. I don’t agree with some of what he writes, but find his posts thoughtful and an enjoyable read.  If you used to read this or DGreport, you might take a look. He doesn’t make a point of hiding or identifying himself, so I won’t either.

mark4dg.com

I’m running for one of three seats for Village Council in the election scheduled for April 5, 2011.

I’m asking residents to vote for me based on a pledge to continue work on the budget, fix the streets, and get better transparency into the why of how decisions are made.

You can scan this site and get a reasonable idea of where I come from on many issues important to local government.  You can also look at DGreport.com, where I also posted.  Our Village faces many of the same issues every local government does; not enough money, too much infrastructure in need of repair and updating, and decisions effecting both happening away from the public eye.

By accident or design is immaterial.  It is what it is, and for my Village to survive and prosper, things can change for the better.  I hope to be part of that hard work; to not just vote, but to do the research needed to fully explain the why and how that leads to that vote, and to do so in the public eye.  All of us deserve no less.

Should DuPage end Townships?

The village council approved putting three advisory questions on the ballot this November.  One advisory question asks, in essence, whether Townships could be eliminated.

Good idea or not?

Townships where they exist are required by the state to perform three functions: maintain Township roads and bridges, provide temporary aid to the needy, and provide property assessments.

Eliminating Townships, by state statute, can only be accomplished by a binding voter referendum within a county.  It cannot be done via state-wide referendum.  So the question might be posed instead: “Should Townships in DuPage County cease to exist?”

DISCLOSURES:  I’m a republican precinct committeeman.  I am related to a former Naperville Township Assessor (Mom).

I’ve sat on this post since May, not quite sure what to do with it.  What follows is some background information that can serve as a jumping off point for further investigation and discussion.  No claims to completeness, and no conclusions.  I didn’t find what I expected.  Right up front, any public officials want to comment please do.  Any emails sent on this one will be published in full.

History

40% of states (20 of 50) have state-wide or partial township layers of government.  In Illinois 85 of 102 counties are subdivided into 1,432 Townships.  LaSalle County has the most (37).  The City of Chicago opted out of Townships yet the balance of the county has Townships (30).  Putnam County has the fewest Townships (4).  DuPage is at the lower end of the scale with nine Townships.

Most of the 102 counties in Illinois are largely rural farm land except Cook and the 8 collar counties.  Counties that voted to create Townships starting in 1849 (authorized by the Township Act of 1847) were carved up into roughly 36 square mile areas to more efficiently provide a local level of service, typically performed by the resident farmers themselves, and similar to what settlers were used to as a form of government.  The services that non-Chicago Cook and collar county Townships provide (to residents not in a municipality) can include trash collection, recycling, public ROW tree maintenance, brush collection, fire protection, schools, temporary aid for the poor, and ditch, road and bridge maintenance.  Police protection is sometimes provided by state or county, sometimes by a municipality (particularly in non-Chicago Cook County).

In farm based Townships the needs for government are few.  Duties are in many cases still taken up by the resident farmers themselves, such as volunteer Township Fire Departments, clearing and maintaining drainage ditches, and re-graveling roads.  Some heavy farm counties have very small staffs and budgets.  For perspective, Downers Grove has more people and a significantly larger budget than 50 counties in Illinois.

In Cook and the collar counties, endless farms and an elevator every sixteen miles are not the norm.  County governments are strong and provide many of the services farm-based Townships perform.  Additionally, in DuPage much of the County is under the jurisdiction of municipalities.  Schools, policing, fire protection, trash, water and sewer, are all offered either by the county or by municipalities.

Illinois has a history of creating separate taxing districts rather than expanding budgets within existing units.

Example: Within some of the 1,433 Townships exist 1,397 Road & Bridge Districts as separate taxing bodies.

Example: There are 850 Drainage Districts that exist within municipalities, Townships or Counties and 111 Housing Authorities, none of which are required to file Annual Financial Reports with the State Comptrollers Office.

We have taxing districts that, at least at the surface, defy logic:

Example: DuPage County taxpayers pay taxes for a County Airport Authority that runs a conference center, a golf course, and commercial real estate development.

Example: Taxpayers in various parts of Illinois pay for nine different Port Districts.

Example: River Forest Township exists completely within the municipal borders of River Forest the Village.  It has zero miles of roads, no unincorporated area, no unincorporated population, and the Cook County Assessor does assessments.  Ditto for Oak Park Township, Berwyn Township, and Evanston Township.

Example: Illinois has 329 Multi-Township Assessment Districts as overlays on Townships, already sharing one of the biggest functions (assessing and keeping property tax records) of Townships.

Roads and Bridges

Roads appear to be a significant cost function of Townships, including DuPage County Townships.  Historically that has entailed maintaining a system of gravel farm roads based closely on the grid system of the Township itself, so farmers can get crops to market.

A drill-down of some municipal budgets shows while roads are a significant cost factor, most municipalities do not fund road maintenance and construction at a level that would match townships on a per mile basis.

  • In Downers Grove Township there are 74 miles of roads, mostly curbless with ditch drainage.  In 2008 the township budgeted $2,163,125 for roads, or about $29,231/mile.
  • The village claims roughly 160 miles of roads.  Roads under Village jurisdiction vary in load capability.  Most of the miles are residential streets, but the Village also is responsible for streets in Ellsworth Business Park for example, designed for heavier traffic and loads, that can be more expensive to build and maintain.  The 2008 AFR filed with the state indicates General Fund Streets and Highway expenditures totaled $6,471,737, or $40,448/mile.
  • The county Division of Transportation maintains approximately 220 miles of arterial highways and 92 miles of multi-purpose trails in DuPage County.  County roads here in DuPage tend to be arterial roads designed for higher traffic levels and heavier loads.  There are no General Fund expenditures listed for county, rather there are Special Revenue budget expenditure for Streets and Highways listed in the 2008 AFR filed with the state as $21,188,877.  Ignoring the county bike and walking trails that works out to $96,313/mile.

Temporary aid for the needy

Providing temporary assistance for the needy appears to be a minor function for several Townships including DG Township; $65K represents a small fraction of their total budget.  Some Townships on the north side of DuPage County spend much higher dollar amounts, but all combined are dwarfed by the county budget, which is fairly labyrinthine.  Many social services are administered by the County; housing assistance, food and clothing vouchers, medical, dental and vision care, and services to the elderly (a significant part of a county budget).

Assistance provided at the Township level is designed as temporary, until the state or county can properly be brought into the assistance process, so a low dollar figure does not necessarily mean few people receive help.

Township assistance, partly due to its temporary nature, initiates very fast but does not last very long; it’s mainly there to keep people in need going until they can apply to county and enroll in public aid at that level.  County aid at its fastest takes two weeks to begin because of state requirements for interviews and evaluations prior to acceptance into any aid program.

In Downers Grove Township there is a food pantry, housed within the Township building, that can provide immediate food for those in need.

Property Assessment

In many of the farm counties outside notable population centers like Rockford, Peoria, Springfield, etc., the fabric of government itself is the Township and the Farm Bureau.  In these areas, Townships often either adopted similar assessment systems, or consolidated assessment functions, usually combining six or more townships under one Assessor’s Office.  In some areas, those unified systems later became de facto County Assessor functions, and that in turn was the primary county government function, providing assessment service to the townships.  In these farm counties, parcel sizes are most commonly chunks of acreage: 160 acres, 80 acres, 40 acres, and 5 acres (homestead carve-outs).  There are 640 acres in a square mile.

In Cook County and the City of Chicago governments dominate the political landscape and have a strong single County Assessor.  And plenty of documented corruption.  Sparsely populated farm Counties where Townships follow closely similar rules and regulations for records keeping and assessment tend to be small and efficient.

DuPage County is highly populated, and highly fragmented.  It includes, but is not limited to the following independent taxing bodies:

  • 39 municipalities in whole or in part
  • 37 school districts
  • 24 Park Districts
  • 18 Fire Protection Districts
  • 9 townships
  • 1 airport

128 taxing bodies, and that’s not counting them all.

DuPage County has a high number of taxed property parcels, a less centralized government, and Townships that have evolved differently and independent from each other.  DuPage County Townships are unlike most (but not all) other Counties, in that they do not have a unified assessment system that is the same from Township to Township.

Nor does it have a County Assessor.  DuPage County has a central Supervisor of Assessments office.   The SoA was created by state law to provide statistical assessment performance data to the Illinois Department of Revenue.  They also provide statistical analysis of assessment data to the Township Assessors and the DuPage County Board of Review.  They keep the records of Exemptions, and are probably best known (and function misunderstood) for publishing assessment change notices in newspapers, and mailing property tax notices to taxpayers.

In DuPage County, each of the Township Assessors specifies and maintains their own computer based valuation system in addition to physical records that detail the history of the Township for property taxes.  The type and specification of the physical property data, as well as how that information is classified, updated, stored and maintained by these systems varies from township to township.  There are common components to some of these systems, but no two of them are identical.  Software consolidation/migration of nine separate systems into one universal application, ending with a unified system, currently do not have an estimated cost or time frame.

This distinction places DuPage County in a unique situation compared to counties that provide a centralized valuation system for their respective townships.  Developing a “one-size fits all” valuation system that would produce acceptable results in a diverse 330,000-parcel jurisdiction would be a major undertaking.  It would take several years to recover the additional costs associated creating a new countywide valuation system.  There would also be operation trade-offs for such a consolidation such as lack of flexibility of a centralized system to timely respond to local issues.

Another cost factor would occur in acquiring and/or converting existing property characteristics data needed to produce reliable assessments.  This software/conversion process is typically many more times expensive than the system/hardware acquisition costs.   The cost of acquiring the total hardware/software solutions required would be only one part of the overall true cost to the taxpayers for undergoing such a conversion project.

Staff and physical office space is another budgetary issue that would impact centralization of assessment method and process.  Currently, county offices are filled to capacity, so the assessment/appeal function would require either additional space near the County complex, or more realistically satellite offices, preferably located near where the property exists.  Adding space near the county complex or splitting the Supervisor of Assessments Office into multiple locations introduces its own inefficiencies and costs.

The strong central government in Cook County has created its own problems, and those spread throughout the Cook County Assessors office.

Corruption in Cook County: Anti-Corruption Report Number 3, published February 18, 2010 by the University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Political Science and the Better Government Association, is only the latest of a series of reports documenting problems of a County-wide Assessor function within the report.  During the 1950’s Cook County Assessor Frank Keenan and his two brothers were convicted on corruption charges, and in the 1970’s P.J. Cullerton became the poster boy for all that is wrong with county-wide corruption in centralized assessment.

By separating assessment functions to independent Township entities here in DuPage, and then coordinating the results with the Supervisor of Assessments, DuPage County has, by design or accident, avoided the corruption of process and people that are associated with centralized government assessment functions in Cook County.

Annual costs per employee

When Annual Financial Reports filed with the State Comptroller office are examined for number and total cost of employees including benefits, Downers Grove Township had lower per employee payroll costs than DuPage County.  Both the Township and the County had lower per employee payroll costs than the Village.

2006 represents a shortened budget year, when the village switched to a calendar year.  Village personnel have a $20,000 to $26,000 benefit cost attached to each salary, highest of the three levels of local government.  The municipality provides the most services to the taxpayers.

At all three levels, personnel costs appear to be near the middle of the pack-Downers Grove costs are average for a municipality, Downers Grove Township costs are average for a Township, and DuPage County costs are average for a county per employee.  Verifying that in exact detail is outside the scope of this post.

Any local, township, or county official who may have comments on this post, or can provide additional information, are invited to either post them here as a comment or send them as an email.  Any responses will be considered public responses for publication here as a comment.

Sources:

(60 ILCS 1/) Township Code, Illinois Compiled Statutes

Township Officials of Illinois

DuPage County’s Official Website

The Case Against Houlihan

DuPage County Supervisor of Assessments Office, Craig V. Doval,  County  Supervisor of Assessments

Illinois State Office of the Comptroller, Local Government Division

Corruption in Cook County: Anti-Corruption Report Number 3, published February 18, 2010

Township Government: Essential or Expendable? The Case of Illinois and Cook County, 2008,  David K. Hamilton

Streamlining Local Government, 2007, Indiana Commission for Local Government Reform.

RIP John Wooden

John Robert Wooden

October 14, 1910–June 4, 2010.

The greatest of them all.

Required Reading

Read it and weep.

The rights protected by this paragraph may not be diminished by contract or other agreement, and nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to diminish any greater or additional protection provided by Federal or State law or by contract or other agreement.

Reconcile yourself a huge new bureaucracy, a heaping steaming pile of new taxes directly on the middle class,  rationing of drug research, forced unionization of nurses.  With student loan goodness.  This 2,309 pages of legislation does not address the central problem of skyrocketing health-care costs, ands skyrocketing health care insurance costs.

Oh, and if you don’t already have it and have a doctor for it, Medicare is history.  Bon appetit…

White House: We will monitor all emails

We’re going to scan all of your emails but trust us, it’ll be okay, because Homeland Security does everything so well…

Recently de-classified documents reveal Einstein, an NSA enabled domestic spying program that will allow the government to scan any and every email of every citizen.

Required Reading

Don’t read articles about the reports, read the reports.

Hilarious

This scene gets used a lot, but this time it is one of the funniest take offs…

DGreport.com Hacked

After surpassing a million visits, Elaine Johnson’s DGreport appears to have been hacked by a turkish site  http://hovardayiz.net/

Usually when a site gets hit with a redirect bug, it’s because a back door was left open, allowing unauthorized code to be inserted.

RedSpeed Exposed

marni_pyke

Marni Pyke- Local Hero

The Daily Herald slowly picked up steam on the scheming by RedSpeed and the Red Light Camera industry, and this weeks article by Marni Pyke shines the brightest light yet on the calculated for-profit ploy to use government and our safety officials-the police themselves-as dupes in their scheming.

Choice quotes:

RedSpeed credits its lobbyists, who include former elected officials, for its legislative successes. But it recognized the opposition was fierce and blamed voters in an April update.

“Most DuPage County senators are still having serious reservations about voting yes,” the update states. “Many constituents have been pressuring them to vote against the speed bill. It would help if they heard from police colleagues and friends on the importance of passing this bill.”

And more:

RedSpeed is sensitive to negative publicity. Following a critical radio interview by Duffy, RedSpeed e-mailed police chiefs, mayors and village trustees stating the senator “made several inaccurate statements about your (red light) programs, using this misinformation as a platform for his position.”

The e-mail offers talking points for local leaders.

For example, to offset arguments that cameras are installed for revenue reasons, the e-mail notes that “if drivers do not break the traffic laws, they do not receive a ticket and subsequent fine.”

Duffy shot back that RedSpeed has donated more than $39,000 in recent years to legislators to promote its cause while collecting millions of fines from Illinois citizens and urging lawmakers to ignore the voices of the public.

“The facts remain the same. The majority of tickets are issued because motorists roll past the white line when turning right on red. If turning right on red is a safety issue, then why don’t legislators make them illegal?” he said.

Read her whole story and more here.

For her efforts to investigate and expose the scam and how it has attempted to infiltrate Illinois, Marni Pyke has been shut out by RedSpeed officials, who refuse to return her calls and answer her questions.  Additionally, RedSpeed company attorneys have attempted to block Daily Herald FOIA requests for email records of their lobbying and marketing campaign, claiming the request for public records violated personal privacy and trade secrets exemptions provided by law.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.